South Dakota licenses individual and small on-site wastewater system installers. The credential
is issued by the state — by the State Plumbing Commission, which examines for it — and the
section that names this trade is SDCL 36-25-17.3. In the same breath, because these two get
heard together and only one of them is true: the state does not review plans for a conventional
individual on-site system. ARSD 74:53:01:03 lets that system be designed and installed without
project plans being submitted to the state for review and approval. A licensed person, and no
state sign-off on the design.
The reason the first answer a search returns is likely to be wrong is that the counter moved. In
2021 the legislature transferred licensure of the people who alter, repair, construct or install
these systems to the Plumbing Commission, and repealed the environmental agency’s authority to
certify them. What was repealed was the authority, not the duty — and the administrative-rule
chapter written under that repealed authority is still published, still in the present tense,
still describing the old counter. Three official South Dakota publications still send an
installer there. The commission is the counter now.
There is a limit on this page and it is better stated than written around. South Dakota’s
licensing chapter was not read whole for this record: eight of its sections were retrieved, and
the state’s own served page for the operative section points at neighboring sections that were
not, so the chapter runs past what was read. That matters for exactly one question, and it is a
question of scope. Nothing that was read takes any class of septic operator outside this
license; nothing that was read confirms that the chapter exempts nobody. A second, smaller
question rides along: the older rule bounds a small on-site system by a head count and a daily
volume, while the statute’s own definition at SDCL 36-25-1(2) carries no size band at all. So
this page says what the statute says and stops. It does not tell you that every septic operator
in South Dakota must hold this license, and it does not tell you that any of them need not —
that is a question about your scope of work, and it is one to put to the commission, or to us,
before you price the job.
The permit that authorizes a particular job is frequently a county instrument, and it is easy
to blur with the state credential.
Minnehaha County’s on-site wastewater ordinance requires a county permit, issued by the county
planning official, before a system may be installed or operated in the county’s unincorporated
area — and the same ordinance restates the state credential rather than creating one of its own.
That is the shape: a state license that follows the person, a county permit that follows the
lot. It is named to the one county read for this page and it is not a count of how many South
Dakota counties permit.
In South Dakota workers compensation is an election rather than a duty, and the election has a price. No
South Dakota law requires a private employer to carry it; under SDCL 62-5-7 an employer that
leaves compensation unsecured is treated as having elected out of the workers compensation
title, and SDCL 62-3-11 is what that election costs. The part a septic
business needs is the consequence for the people it works for: because the state compels nobody,
a general contractor here has no state agency confirming that its septic sub is insured, while
SDCL 62-3-10 makes that contractor answerable for the sub’s injured employee anyway. A
certificate of insurance does work in South Dakota that a licensing statute does elsewhere.
None of that is an insurance requirement: the state conditions this license on an application,
a fee and an examination, and on nothing about insurance.
The credential question and the coverage question are different questions, and the sections
below set out each one with the authority it rests on, so you can check it rather than take our
word for it.